ANALITYCAL DESCRIPTIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ CRITICAL MATHEMATIC THINKING ABILITY THROUGH GRADED RESPONSE MODEL (GRM)
(*) Corresponding Author
Critical mathematic thinking ability is very important to solve daily problems. But in reality, junior high school students’ critical mathematic thinking ability is still low. Ability measurement such as measurement of critical mathematic thinking ability cannot be measured through multiple choices test. In that case, an essay test in which graded scoring is used as scoring technique more suitable than multiple choices test. The result of the essay test will be analyzed to describe the already tested ability. There are two approaches in the measurement analysis; classical test theory and item response theory (IRT). The classical test theory has some weaknesses because it only depends on how many the right answers student could achieved. Meanwhile, the IRT technique is more suitable to analyze ability because lies on the pattern of the response and parameter of item test. Graded response models (GRM) is one of the IRT models that analyzed graded response.
The purposes of this research are to know about the result of the item parameter estimation of the test which has been developed by the researcher and to know the result of student’s critical mathematic thinking ability parameter estimation through GRM (Graded Response Models). The research is a descriptive quantitative research. The population of this research are 8th grade students of MTs Al-Ishlah Bobos and of SMP N 1 Dukupuntang in the academic year of 2012/2013. Applying purposive sampling method this research took 140 students as a sample, from whom 70 students from MTs Al-Ishlah Bobos and 70 students from SMP N 1 Dukupuntang. Measurement theory used in this research is Item Response Theory (IRT) with the GRM model and the instrument used to collect data is critical mathematic thinking ability test paper.
The result of the item parameter estimation shows that in terms of the item discrimination all four items tested are less good, meanwhile in the terms of item difficulty the results vary. The first item of the test is considered to be easy, the second and the third item of the test is considered to be very difficult, and the last item of the test is considered just difficult. The result of the critical mathematic thinking ability parameter estimation shows that 4,2% of students have very high critical mathematic thinking ability, 16,4% have high critical mathematic thinking ability, 65,7% have mean critical mathematic thinking ability, 13,5% have low critical mathematic thinking ability and there is no single student with very low critical mathematic thinking ability.
Key words : critical mathematic thinking, item of the test parameter, ability parameter, IRT, GRM
Anggrayani, Arie. 2009. Penerapan Teori Uji Klasik dan Teori Respon Butir DalamMengevaluasi Butir Soal. Thesis. Unpublished. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: RinekaCipta
Ariyanti, Melda. 2010. “Pengaruh Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Maematika Siswa Kelas XI SMA Di Kabupaten Kuningan”. Thesis. Unpublished. Cirebon: IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
Azwar, Saifudin. 2012. Metode Penelitian, Yogya: Pustaka Pelajar
Browne, M. Neils and Keeley, Stuart M. 2007. Asking The Right Question; A Guide to Critical Thinking (Eighth Edition). New Jearsey: Pearson Prentice Hall
Budiharti, Rini. 2011. Kemampuan Mahasiswa Prodi Fisika Dalam Mengembangkan Test Essay Materi Pembelajaran Fisika Sekolah Menengah. Thesis. Unpublished. Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Cagnone, Silvia and Ricci, Roberto. 2005. Student Ability Assessment Based on Two IRT Models. Journal of Methodology.
Dawber, T., Rogers, W.T., and Carbonaro, M. 2004. Robustness of Lord’s Formulas for Item Difficulty and Discrimination Conversation Between Classical and Item Response Theory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of AERA, the American Education Research Association, April 12, 2004, San Diego, California. PDF copy possibly available via: www.education.ualberta.ca/educ/psych/crame/research.htm.
Echols, John M. and Shadily, Hasan. 2003. An English-Indonesian Dictionary. Jakarta: Gramedia
Embretson, Susan E. 1996. The New Rules of Measurement. University of Kansas: Psychology Assessment Journal
Fisher, Alec. 2009. Berpikir Kritis; Sebuah Pengantar. Jakarta: Erlangga
Hambleton, Ronald K. and Jones, Russell W. 2005. An NCME Instructional Module on Comparison of Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory and Their Applications to Test Development. Jurnal of University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Hambleton, Ronald K. and Swaminathan, Hariharan. 1985. Item Response Theory Principles and Applications. Canada: Published by John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Hassoubah, Zaleha. 2008. Mengasah Pikiran Kreatif dan Kritis Disertai Ilustrasi dan Latihan. Bandung: Nuansa
Hidayati, Kana. 2002. Keakuratan Hasil Analisis Butir Menurut Teori Tes Klasik dan Teori Respon Butir Ditinjau dari Ukuran Sampel. Thesis. Unpublished. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. http://bahasa.kemdiknas.go.id; diunduh pada tanggal 02 November
, pukul 20:24
Klein, R. B. 2005. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling (2nd ed.). NewYork: Guildford Press
Kusumaningrum, Maya and Saefudin, Abdul Azis. 2012. Mengoptimalkan Kemampuan Berpikir Matematika Melalui Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Prosiding. ISBN: 978-979-16353-8-7.
Lawshe, C. H. 1975. A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity. Personnel PsychologyJournal
Lestari, Sartika. 2012. Penerapan Generalized Partial Credit Model Dalam Teor Respon Butir Untuk Menduga Kemampuan Hasil Tes Uraian. Thesis. Unpublished. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Marrapodi, Jean. 2003. Critical Thinking and Creativity; An Overview and Comparison of
The Theories. Paper. Unpublished. Ravenswood Avenue.
Matteucci, M. and Stracqualursi, L. 2006. Student Assessment Via Graded Response Model.Statistics Journal.
Muijs, Daniel and Reynolds, David. 2011. Effective Teaching: Evidence and Practice.Califrnia: Sage Publication. Available via: www.amazon.com
Mulyasa, E. 2002. Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya
Noer, Sri Hastuti. 2009. Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa SMP Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah. Prosiding.
Ostini, Remo and Nering, Michael L. 2006. Polytomus Item Response Theory Models.California: Sage Publications.
Article MetricsAbstract view : 697 times
PDF - 437 times
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 didin nurul, zara zahra anasha
View My Stats
EduMa: Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching by https://syekhnurjati.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/eduma/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.