Propositional Proofing Techniques application in Algebraic Structure Research

Muhamad Ali Misri(1*),


(1) IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This paper investigates proofing techniques which are used in algebraic structure research and how to apply those techniques. This paper also investigates the reasoning behind the application of the techniques and their effects. The data was collected by reviewing some algebraic structure textbooks used recently. Books reviewed were domestic and foreign books. The results of the review process were noted and documented, and then finally transcribed and coded. The review process of each book was carried out twice. The data obtained were then triangulated, to get the valid data, and eventually used for further analytical purposes. The results obtained show that not all the proofing techniques were used in the proofing process in the algebraic structure research. They tended to use the same technique in every proofing activity. This might be due to mastery of proofing techniques, preferences for certain proofing techniques, lack of information about the development of various proofing techniques. The resulting impact can be identified from the steps of proofing, meanwhile, if it is conducted using another technique, it can reduce the steps, is more acceptable also comprehensible

Keywords


Aljebraic structure research; Proofing technique; Triangulated methods

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bleiler-Baxter, S. K., & Pair, J. D. (2017). Engaging students in roles of proof. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 47, 16-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.05.005

Brown, S. A. (2017). Are indirect proofs less convincing? A study of students’comparative assessments. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.12.010

Daepp, U., & Gorkin, P. (2011). Reading, Writing and Proving: A Closer Look at Mathematics (2nd Edition ed.). London: Springer.

Gallian, J. A. (2017). Contemporary Abstract Algebra. Boston: Cengage Learning.

Hungerford, T. W. (2014). Abstract Algebra: An Introduction (3rd Edition ed.). Boston: Brooks/ Cole.

Lee, K. (2016). Students’ proof schemes for mathematical proving anddisproving of propositions. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 41, 26-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.11.005

Miller, D., Infante, N., & Weber, K. (2017). How mathematicians assign points to student proofs. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.03.002

Misri, M. A. (2017). Struktur Grup. Cirebon: CV. Confident.

Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Yan, X. (2019). Key ideas in a proof: The case of the irrationality of √2. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 55, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2019.04.001




DOI: 10.24235/eduma.v9i1.5624

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 182 times
PDF - 27 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2020

dultogel

dultogel

https://www.cermin4dkuda.com/

rubahtoto

slot gacor

slot gacor

situs tunai138

tokyo77

mahjong ways 2

slot gratis saldo

pg soft

slot depo 5k

Tokyo77

slot depo 10k

slot garansi kekalahan

togel hk

ibcbet

tokyo77

saba sport

slot777

tokyo77

slot

sate777

wdtoto

ayo788 login

Naga2000

Hao788

naga2000

haha788

gototo

Buncistoto

slot gacor

slot gacor

idn slot

yuantoto

gototo

slot deposit 1000

cermin4d

https://1tunai138.com/

royal22

janjislot

tunai138

mega888 apk

POSKOBET

POSKOBET

POSKOBET

POSKOBET

POSKOBET

POSKOBET

POSKOBET

POSKOBET

POSKOBET

POSKOBET

POSKOBET

POSKOBET

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787