Aninda nidhomil Hima(1*), Teguh Hadi Saputro(2),

(1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
(2) Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
(*) Corresponding Author


Abstract: For many reasons, the use of scoring rubrics has acquired more attention. However, the number of studies investigating the perception and the writing performance as well as the relationship between those two variables in the use of rubric is limited. Therefore, by involving 27 students in Writing -class of an English Language Education Department at a particular university in Indonesia, the present study aimed to explore the students’ perceptions through surveys and their writing performance in the three different situations in which they had no scoring rubric, generate their own scoring rubric and had teacher-made scoring rubric prior to the writing tasks. Also, the study was intended to explore how the students perceived the three situations related to their writing performance. After analyzing the data, it was found that the most helpful situation for the students was the second situation. It also helped the students to achieve the higher score compared to the other two situations. However, there was a contradictory finding in which the students’ perception and their performance were negatively correlated.


Keywords: developing scoring rubrics, writing performance, students’       perception

Full Text:



Alaei, M. M., Ahmadi, M., & Zadeh, N. S. (2014). The Impact of Rater’s Personality Traits on Holistic and Analytic Scores: Does Genre Make any Difference too? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1240–1248.

Allen, D., & Tanner, K. (2006). Rubrics: tools for making learning goals and evaluation criteria explicit for both teachers and learners. CBE Life Sciences Education, 5(3), 197–203.

Andrade, H., & Du, Y. (2005). Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(3), 1–11.

Becker, A. (2016). Student-generated scoring rubrics: Examining their formative value for improving ESL students’ writing performance. Assessing Writing, 29, 15–24.

Çetin, Y. (2011). Reliability of raters for writing assessment: Analytic - Holistic, Analytic - Analytic, Holistic - Holistic. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 8(16), 471–486. Retrieved from

East, M. (2009). Evaluating the reliability of a detailed analytic scoring rubric for foreign language writing. Assessing Writing, 14(2), 88–115.

Ene, E., & Kosobucki, V. (2016). Rubrics and corrective feedback in ESL writing: A longitudinal case study of an L2 writer. Assessing Writing, 30, 3–20.

Hidden Curriculum. (2014). Rubric Definition - The Glossary of Education Reform. Retrieved November 13, 2017, from

Hricko, M., & Howell, S. L. (2006). Online assessments and measurement : foundations and challenges. Hershey Penns.: Information Science Pub.

Jackson, E. (2017). Types of Rubrics | Rubrics | Feedback & Grading | Teaching Guides | DePaul University Teaching Commons. Retrieved November 13, 2017, from

Karkehabadi, S. (2013). Using Rubrics to Measure and Enhance Student Performance. Retrieved from

Labs, C. (2017). Overview of Rubrics: Advantages and Disadvantages – Baseline Help Center. Retrieved August 31, 2017, from

Lane, J. L. (1996). The Basic of Rubrics. Retrieved from

Matsuda, P. K., & Jeffery, J. V. (2012). Voice in Student Essays. In Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres (pp. 151–165). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Neill, L. C. O. (2007). Student perceptions regarding the use of rubrics in writing assignments.

Office of graduate Studies Teaching at UNL. (2017). Scoring Rubrics | Teaching at UNL | University of Nebraska–Lincoln. Retrieved November 13, 2017, from

Rakedzon, T., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2017). To make a long story short: A rubric for assessing graduate students’ academic and popular science writing skills. Assessing Writing, 32, 28–42.

Rezaei, A. R., & Lovorn, M. (2010). Reliability and validity of rubrics for assessment through writing. Assessing Writing, 15(1), 18–39.

Sundeen, T. H. (2014). Instructional rubrics: Effects of presentation options on writing quality. Assessing Writing, 21, 74–88.

Vision, T. (2017). Student-Generated Rubrics: Part Five in a Five-Part Series - TeacherVision. Retrieved November 20, 2017, from

Yoshina, J. M., & Harada, V. H. (2007). Involving Students in Learning through Rubrics. Library Media Connection, 25(5), 10–14.

DOI: 10.24235/eltecho.v2i2.2170

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 691 times
PDF - 353 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.


This Journal is indexed by:



Web Analytics Made Easy - Statcounter
View My Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.