Destra Wibowo Kusumo(1*), Distya Kusuma Wardani(2),

(2) Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author


The study intends: (1) to investigate the illocutionary acts and illocutionary forces; (2) to investigate the direct and indirect acts realized in the spoken dialogs in the textbook Bahasa Inggris SMA/ MA/ SMK/ MAK Kelas XII; and (3) to investigate whether the illocutionary forces fulfill the language functions in Basic Competence Curriculum 2013.This research was descriptive qualitative. The data was in the form of all utterances of the spoken dialogs. The main instrument is, hence, the researcher himself with the help of data sheet as the secondary  instrument. The data of this research were all the spoken dialogs. The data were then coded and analyzed by means of concept of illocutionary acts and the that of direct and indirect acts proposed by Searle (1979) with pragmatic identity method as proposed by Sudaryanto (1993/2009). Four types of illocutionary acts are found: representatives, expressives, directives, and commissives. Fourteen types of illocutionary forces are also found, namely stating an opinion, informing, reporting, explaining, describing, agreeing, greeting, leave-taking, stating surprise, thanking, sympathizing, commanding, requesting, suggesting, wishing, questioning, promising, and offering. Next, the direct acts dominate the utterances in the dialogs. From the research it is concluded that the textbook has fulfilled the language functions as stated in basic competence. Next, based on the findings of direct and indirect acts, the textbook has not realized the direct acts which influence the English natural conversations which lead to the authenticity.


pragmatics; illocutionary; spoken dialog; English textbook evaluation

Full Text:



Brown, H.D. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching, 5th Edition. San Francisco: Longman.

Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics and Discourse: A Resource Book for Students. London & New York: Routledge.

Griffiths, P. (2006). An Introduction to English Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press.

Kemdikbud. (2013). Kompetensi Inti dan Kompetensi Dasar untuk SMA/SMK/MA/MAK. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.

Krisnawati, E. (2011). Pragmatic competence in the spoken English classroom. Conaplin Journal, 1(1), 104-111. Retrieved August 31, from


Lodico, G.M., Spaulding, D.T., & Voegtle, K.H. (2010). Methods in Educational Research: From Theory to Practice, 2nd Edition. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.

Mey, J.L. (2001). Pragmatics: An Introduction, 2nd Edition. Maldon: Blackwell.

Moleong. L.J. (2004). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Edisi Revisi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Richards, J.C. & Rodgers, T.S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching, 2nd Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Searle, J.R. (1979). Expressing and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Sudaryanto. (1993/2009). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan Secara Linguistis. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Universitas Sanata Dharma

Tomlinson, B. (1998). Materials Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wardhaugh, R. (2006). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics, 5th Edition. Oxford: Blackwell.

Wijana, I.D.P. (1996). Dasar-dasar Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

DOI: 10.24235/eltecho.v4i2.5164

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 53 times
PDF - 15 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.


This Journal is indexed by:



View My Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.