Challenges in English Writing within Blended Learning Environment

Lilia Indriani(1), Widya Ratna Kusumaningrum(2), Rolisda Yosintha(3*),

(1) Universitas Tidar
(2) Universitas Tidar
(3) Universitas Tidar
(*) Corresponding Author


This study reports a case study research in Writing Blended Learning Environment for higher education that enriched digital environment study especially in the pandemic of Covid-19. It examines the students’ writing apprehension and their performance as perceived by a selected group of EFL students who enroll in Professional Writing class. Questionnaires were administered to three writing lecturers and fifty students of the English Department, Universitas Tidar. The obtained data were analyzed quantitatively using descriptive statistics, while those obtained from the interview were analyzed qualitatively using Miles, Huberman, and Saldana’s model (2014). The findings show that there are many challenges faced by both the teachers and the students when they implemented this writing blended learning environment. Though, some challenges give not only the pitfalls but also positive contribution to the students’ learning progress in their writing. The study found that students need specific and intensive instruction, practice, and feedback for improving their writing skills. It is also found that learning writing through writing blended learning environment is somehow interesting and also challenging in some covered topics and activities, while lecturers still have their instructional and pedagogical roles in a blended learning environment.


blended learning environment, EFL, writing

Full Text:



Abbas, S. (2006). Pembelajaran bahasa Indonesia yang efektif di sekolah dasar. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Akçayır, G., & Akçayır, M. (2018). , G., & Akçayır, M. (2018). The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges. Computers and Education, 126, 334–345.

Berge, Z. (2013). Barriers to communication in distance education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14(1), 374–388.

Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Michigan: David McKay Company Inc.

Brown, H. D., & Abeywickrama, P. (2010). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. New York: Pearson Education White Plains.

Chaer, A. (2012). Linguistik Umum. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Gopalan, C., Bracey, G., Klann, M., & Schmidt, C. (2018). Embracing the flipped classroom: The planning and execution of a faculty workshop. Advances in Physiology Education, 42(4), 648–654.

Henry, T. G. (2008). Membaca sebagai suatu keterampilan berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.

Krathwohl, D. (2002). A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212-218.

Maya, Y. (2020). Penggunaan Blended Learning pada Pembelajaran Era Industri 4.0. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 4(2), 31-38.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. London: SAGE Publication.

Soeparno. (2002). Dasar-dasar Linguistik Umum. Jakarta: Tiara Wacana.

Tarigan, H. G. (2009). Pengajaran Sintaksis. Bandung: Angkasa.

Torre, J. D. (2019). Using Edmodo in Blended Learning : Its Benefits and Drawbacks. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 2(1), 31-40.

DOI: 10.24235/eltecho.v6i1.7480

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.


This Journal is indexed by:



View My Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.