Acquisition of Arabic Language based on Stephen Krashen's Theory in the Arabic Camp Activities
(1) UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
The determining factors for a person's success in language vary widely. One of them is the acquisition of a person's language which is a source of skill in producing the language itself. There is often a contradiction between the terms language acquisition and language learning. Psycholinguistics experts view that language acquisition only occurs for the first language, but this is different from Stephen Khrasen who stated that language acquisition can be obtained for foreign languages. On this basis, researchers studied the implementation of foreign language acquisition at MAN 1 Padang during the Arabic Camp activity, based on Stephen Khrasen's theory. Researchers used a qualitative approach with a case study research design. Data collection includes observation, interviews and documentation with data analysis techniques using data triangulation. The results showed that the acquisition of a second language was influenced by good input and processes such as the all-day language environment and good monitoring processes from the tutors. All of this is in accordance with Stephen Khrasen's theory which will provide maximum output in producing Arabic like native speakers even though it is still in a simple sentence formation system in the Camp environment.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alhmadi, Nesreen. “Essential Skills in Arabic: From Intermediate to Advanced.” British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 46, no. 1 (2019): 205–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/13530194.2018.1507435.
Alif Cahya Setiyadi, and Mohammad Syam’un Salim. “Pemerolehan Bahasa Kedua Menurut Stephen Krashen.” Jurnal At-Ta’dib 8, no. 2 (2013).
Bahruddin, Uril, Febriani, Suci Ramadhanti. “Implementation of Krashen ’ s Theory in Language Acquisition Stephen” 13, no. 8 (2020): 821–31.
Febriani, Suci Ramadhanti, Wildana Wargadinata, and Faisal Mahmoud Adam. “Design of Arabic Learning for Senior High School in the 21 St Century” 12, no. 1 (2020): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.24042/albayan.v12i1.5886.
Huang, Qiang. “Learners’ Perceptions of Blended Learning and the Roles and Interaction of F2f and Online Learning.” ORTESOL Journal 33, no. 2013 (2016): 14–33.
Ismail, Nur Salina, and Izah Mohd Tahir. “English Camp Activities: A Strategy to Enhance Students’ English Proficiency.” Studies in Literature and Language 2, no. 3 (2011): 61–72. https://doi.org/10.3968/j.sll.1923156320110203.009.
Kivunja, Charles. “Innovative Methodologies for 21st Century Learning, Teaching and Assessment: A Convenience Sampling Investigation into the Use of Social Media Technologies in Higher Education.” International Journal of Higher Education 4, no. 2 (2015): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v4n2p1.
Krashen, Stephen D. “Formal and Informal Linguistic Environments in Language Acquisition and Language Learning.” TESOL Quarterly 10, no. 2 (1976): 157. https://doi.org/10.2307/3585637.
Lai, Chun. “Modeling Teachers’ Influence on Learners’ Self-Directed Use of Technology for Language Learning Outside the Classroom.” Computers and Education 82 (2015): 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.005.
Lai, Wen, and Lifang Wei. “A Critical Evaluation of Krashen’s Monitor Model.” Theory and Practice in Language Studies 9, no. 11 (2019): 1459. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0911.13.
Lexy J Moleong. Metodologi Peneleitian Kualitatif. Rosdakarya Offset, 2007.
Mahmudi, Arifka, Suci Ramadhanti Febriani, Maidatul Hasanah, Zakiyah Arifa, Universitas Islam, Negeri Maulana, Malik Ibrahim, Kota Malang, and Jawa Timur. “CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT AND ARABIC LEARNING PROCESS BASED ON MULTIPLE Arabiyât” 6, no. 2 (2019): 222–37.
Mohd, Khairun Nisaa, Airil Haimi Mohd Adnan, Ahmad Arifuddin Yusof, Muhammad Khairul Ahmad, and Muhammad Anwar Mohd Kamal. “Teaching Arabic Language to Malaysian University Students Using Education Technologies Based on Education 4.0 Principles.” International Invention, Innovative & Creative (InIIC) Conference, 2019, no. November (2019): 38–51.
Pribadi, Rendy, Zainal Rafli, and Ninuk Lustyantie. “The Influence of Family in Second Language Acquisition in Children Aged 1.5 Years: An Analysis of Monitoring Theory by Krashen” 3, no. 01 (2019): 22–29.
Rifnon, Zaini. “Studi Atas Pemikiran B.F. Skinner Tentang Belajar.” TERAMPIL Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Dasar 1, no. 1 (2014): 118–29.
Safutri, Janniarni Toha, Suci Ramadhanti Febriani, and Danial Hilmi. “Improvement Of Arabic Language Tearcher Competency Based On Multiple Intelligences.” Lughawiyyah 2, no. 1 (2020).
Skinner. Verbal Behavior. Harvard University, 1948.
Stewart, Pamela J., and Andrew J. Strathern. “Breaking the Frames: Anthropological Conundrums.” Breaking the Frames: Anthropological Conundrums, 2016, 1–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47127-3.
Tong, Yixuan, Mao Ying Wu, Philip L. Pearce, Junqing Zhai, and Haili Shen. “Children and Structured Holiday Camping: Processes and Perceived Outcomes.” Tourism Management Perspectives 35, no. February (2020): 100706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100706.
Yin, Robert K. “Robert K. Yin Case Study Research Design and Methods, Third Edition, Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol 5 2002.Pdf,” 2003.
Zhou, Ninger, and Aman Yadav. “Effects of Multimedia Story Reading and Questioning on Preschoolers’ Vocabulary Learning, Story Comprehension and Reading Engagement.” Educational Technology Research and Development 65, no. 6 (2017): 1523–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9533-2.
DOI: 10.24235/ibtikar.v9i2.7222
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Suci Ramadhanti Febriani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2.png)
