.png)
The Comparative Analysis of the Legal Implications of Hadhanah in Decision Number 2562/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Sbr and Decision Number 0037/Pdt.G/2016/PA.Bitg in the Perspective of Maqaṣid al-Syari’ah
(1) universitas islam negeri siber syekh nurjati cirebon
(2) universitas islam negeri siber syekh nurjati cirebon
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study examines the differences in the determination of custody rights in the Sumber Religious Court decision No. 2562/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Sbr and the decision of the Bitung Religious Court Number 0037/Pdt.G/2016/PA.Bitg, even though both refer to the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). The divergence arises due to variations in trial facts, the child’s psychological condition, and the religious beliefs of the parties involved. Therefore, an analysis from the perspective of maqāṣid al-sharī’ah is essential to ensure that custody rulings not only adhere to normative provisions but also safeguard the child’s welfare. The main objectives of this research are to analyse the application of custody law in both cases and to compare them within the framework of maqāṣid al-sharī’ah. The research problems addressed are: (1) How was custody law applied in the Sumber and Bitung Religious Court decisions? and (2) How do these decisions differ when examined through the lens of maqāṣid al-sharī’ah? Using a normative juridical method with comparative and case study approaches, data were collected from legislation, Islamic legal scholarship, and official court rulings. Findings reveal that the Sumber Court prioritised maternal attachment and piety, while the Bitung Court prioritised protection of faith by granting custody to the father.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Al-Nawawī. Al-Majmū‘ Sharḥ Al-Muhadhdhab. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1997.
Arini, Nusra, Asmuni Asmuni, and Nawir Yuslem. “Menggali Hukum Perkawinan Yang Melakukan Kecurangan.” JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia) 10, no. 1 (2024): 529–539.
Asy’ari, Abdul Hamid, Jumni Nelli, and Almi Jera. “Konsep Pengasuhan Bersama (Join Custody) Pasca Perceraian Dalam Pemeliharaan Anak Mernurut Hukum Islam.” Posita: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 3, no. 1 (2025): 27–35.
Baidawi, Ahmad, and Muhammad Zainuddin Sunarto. “Hak Asuh Anak Dalam Perspektif Khi Dan Madzhab Syafi’i.” HAKAM: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam dan Hukum Ekonomi Islam 4, no. 1 (2020).
Fauzan, Ach, and Moh Hamzah. “PENDEKATAN HOLISTIK DALAM HAK ASUH ANAK PASCA PERCERAIAN: PERSPEKTIF MAQĀṢID SYARĪ’AH AL-TAHIR IBNU ASYUR.” al-Rasῑkh: Jurnal Hukum Islam 13, no. 1 (2024): 111–126.
Firdaus, Firdaus. “Hak Hadhanah Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Agama.” JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) 17, no. 2 (2018): 233–243.
Firdaus, Firdaus, Juhasdi Susono, Nahariah Nahariah, and Fita Dewi Yuniar. “Analisis Yuridis Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penetapan Hadhanah Kepada Ayah (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Agama Makassar Kelas 1 A).” Jurnal Tana Mana 5, no. 3 (2024): 296–306.
Fitrotun, Siti. “Perlindungan Anak Dalam UU Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 Dalam Perspektif Fikih Hadhanah.” Istidal: Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam 9, no. 1 (2022): 83–97.
Habibi, Bariq, Tarmizi M Jakfar, and Hajarul Akbar. “Penyelesaian Perkara Hadhanah (Studi Terhadap Pertimbangan Hakim Pada Kasus No. 0138/Pdt. G/2015/Ms. Bna Dan No. 13/Pdt. G/2016/Ms. Aceh).” El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga 4, no. 2 (2021): 470–487.
Hamzah, Moh, and Ahmad Fathorrozi. “Kepentingan Terbaik Anak Dalam Sengketa Hadhanah: Studi Kritis Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Agama Surabaya Nomor 2742/Pdt. G/2024/PA. Sby.” At-Tafakur: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah dan Hukum 2, no. 1 (2025): 121–138.
Hasanah, Cantika Aprilia. “Perlindungan Hukum Dan Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menentukan Hak Asuh Anak Pasca Perceraian.” Journal of Multidisciplinary Inquiry in Science, Technology and Educational Research 2, no. 1b (2025): 1099–1113.
Khair, Umul. “Pelaksanaan Hak Asuh Anak Setelah Terjadinya Perceraian.” JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum) 5, no. 2 (2020): 291–306.
Mahmudah, Husnatul, Juhriati Juhriati, and Zuhrah Zuhrah. “Hadhanah Anak Pasca Putusan Perceraian (Studi Komparatif Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Positif Indonesia).” Sangaji: Jurnal Pemikiran Syariah dan Hukum 2, no. 1 (2018): 57–88.
Muizzudin, Ahmad Haris, and M Willian Anwar. “Tinjauan Yuridis Relevansi Pasal 41 Huruf a Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Dan Pasal 105 Kompilasi Hukum Islam Tentang Hak Asuh Anak Pasca Perceraian.” Al-Akmal: Jurnal Studi Islam 2, no. 3 (2023): 50–62.
Musthofa, Ahmad Misbakh Zainul. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kesejahteraan Anak Dalam Kasus Perceraian Menurut Kitab Fathul Qarib.” Syakhshiyyah Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 5, no. 1 (2025): 157–167.
Nasir, M, and A Badri. “Ijtihad Dan Perkembangan Hukum Islam Di Aceh. Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara Dan Politik Islam, 9 (1), 41-51,” 2022.
Putra, Aldi Jaya Mandala. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pemeliharaan Anak Dibawah Umur (Hak Hadhanah) Akibat Suatu Perceraian Berdasarkan Kompilasi Hukum Islam.” Journal of Law (Jurnal Ilmu Hukum) 5, no. 2 (2020).
Putri, Sophie Hanna, and Mairul Mairul. “Upaya Hukum Dalam Perlindungan Hak Nafkah Anak Akibat Perceraian Orang Tua.” Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research 5, no. 2 (2025): 664–675.
Saleh, Syukri, Robiatul Adawiyah, and Ana Andriyani. “Perlindungan Hak Asuh Anak Pasca Perceraian (Hadhanah): Perspektif Hukum Islam Dan Psikologi Anak.” Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum 3, no. 3 (2025): 2829–2838.
Suteki, Galang Taufani. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum (Filsafat, Teori Dan Praktik). Depok: PT Radja Grafindo Persada, 2018.
Syahrin, Muhammad Alfi, and Akmal Abdul Munir. “Hak Asuh Anak (Hadhanah) Dalam Sistem Hukum Keluarga Indonesia Dan Aljazair.” Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum 3, no. 3 (2025): 1946–1955.
Ulya, Fawzia Hidayatul, Fashi Hatul Lisaniyah, and Mu’amaroh Mu’amaroh. “Penguasaan Hak Asuh Anak Di Bawah Umur Kepada Bapak.” The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Law and Civil Law 2, no. 1 (2021): 101–117.
DOI: 10.24235/inklusif.v10i2.22335
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
 |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |
|