Students’ perspectives and experiences of using ChatGPT as a virtual mentor in self-directed English learning

Fayza Audia Renjani(1*), Dea Anjarwati(2), Marwa Aulianissa(3), Divvi Perwira Asyssidiq(4), Silvya Nurlatifah(5), Syakilah Azzahra(6),


(1) Universitas Islam Negeri Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
(2) UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
(3) UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
(4) UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
(5) UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
(6) UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study investigated students’ perspectives and experiences of using ChatGPT as a virtual mentor in self-directed English learning, addressing the limited focus on learners’ lived experiences in AI-supported educational contexts. A qualitative case study design was employed to explore how students perceive and interact with ChatGPT in their independent learning processes. The participants were seven undergraduate students from an English Education Teaching program, selected through a screening questionnaire. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis. The findings indicate that students experience ChatGPT as a flexible and accessible learning support tool that facilitates understanding of complex materials and enhances language skills, particularly in writing. It also serves as a source of immediate feedback, enabling learners to revise their work efficiently and independently. From an affective perspective, students report increased confidence, reduced anxiety, and greater motivation due to the non-judgmental nature of AI interaction. However, limitations such as lack of personalization, general feedback, and absence of progress tracking are also identified. Overall, ChatGPT is perceived as a complementary virtual mentor that supports, but does not replace, human instruction in self-directed learning.

Keywords: ChatGPT, self-directed learning, virtual mentor, students’ perspectives, learning experiences


Full Text:

PDF

References


Adeoye, M. A. (2023). Review of sampling techniques for education. ASEAN Journal for Science Education, 2(2), 87–94.

Ahimsa, A. F. H., & Khawa, D. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence on english language teaching: Opportunities and challenges in technology era. Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 13(1), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.

Alam, A., & Mohanty, A. (2023). Educational technology: Exploring the convergence of technology and pedagogy through mobility, interactivity, AI, and learning tools. Cogent Engineering, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2023.2283282

Albadarin, Y., Saqr, M., Pope, N., & Tukiainen, M. (2024). A systematic literature review of empirical research on chatgpt in education. Discover Education, 3(60), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00138-2

Amrang, A., Isma, A., Rusdiah, R., & Ridwan, R. (2025). Exploring student experiences in e-learning for english literacy: Voices from an indonesian higher education context. JETAL: Journal of English Teaching & Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 134–146.

Annamalai, N., & Nasor, M. (2025). Exploring ChatGPT in education: Unveiling learners’ experiences through the lens of self‑determination theory. Smart Learning Environments, 12(59), 1–17.

Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2021) Thematic analysis a practical guide. Sage, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69909-7_3470-2

Brinkmann, S. (2022). Qualitative interviewing: Conversational knowledge through research interviews.

Castañeda, R., Martínez-Gómez-Aldaraví, A., Mercadé, L., Gómez, V. J., Mengual, T., Díaz-Fernández, F. J., Sinusia Lozano, M., Navarro Arenas, J., Barreda, Á., Gómez, M., Pinilla-Cienfuegos, E., & Ortiz de Zárate, D. (2024). Use of ChatGPT as a virtual mentor on k-12 students learning science in the fourth industrial revolution. Knowledge, 4(4), 582–614. https://doi.org/10.3390/knowledge4040031

Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students ’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 1–18.

Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). A classification tool to foster self-regulated learning with generative artificial intelligence by applying self-determination theory: A case of ChatGPT. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72, 2401–2416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10366-w

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education (8th ed.).

Cramarenco, R. E., Burcă-Voicu, M. I., & Dabija, D.-C. (2023). Student perceptions of online education and digital technologies during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A systematic review. Electronics, 12, 1–19.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 5th Edition.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.).

Dörnyei, Z., & Taguchi, T. (2010). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing (2nd ed.).

Floridi, L., & Chiriatti, M. (2020). GPT-3: Its nature, scope, limits, and consequences. Minds and Machines, 30, 681–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09548-1

Gill, S. S., Xu, M., Patros, P., Wu, H., Kaur, R., Kaur, K., Fuller, S., Singh, M., Arora, P., Parlikad, A. K., Stankovski, V., Abraham, A., Ghosh, S. K., Lutfiyya, H., Kanhere, S. S.,

Bahsoon, R., Rana, O., Dustdar, S., Sakellariou, R., … Buyya, R. (2024). Transformative effects of ChatGPT on modern education: Emerging era of AI chatbots. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 4, 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.06.002

Giray, L., Nemeño, J., & Edem, J. (2025). Self-directed learning using ChatGPT positively affects student engagement. International Journal of Technology in Education, 8(3), 667–680. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.1162

Guetterman, T. C. (2015). Descriptions of sampling practices within five approaches to qualitative research in education and the health sciences. Forum Qualitative Social Research, 16(2), 1–23.

Hosseini, M., Gao, C. A., Liebovitz, D. M., Carvalho, A. M., Ahmad, F. S., Luo, Y., Macdonald, N., Holmes, K. L., & Kho, A. (2023). An exploratory survey about using ChatGPT in education, healthcare, and research. PLoS ONE, 18(10), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292216

Huesca, G., Martínez-Treviño, Y., Molina-Espinosa, J. M., Sanromán-Calleros, A. R., Martínez-Román, R., Cendejas-Castro, E. A., & Bustos, R. (2024). Effectiveness of using ChatGPT as a tool to strengthen benefits of the flipped learning strategy. Education Sciences, 14, 1–21.

Leavy, P. (2023). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches.

Lee, S. K., Ryu, J., Jie, Y., & Ma, D. H. (2025). Motivations and affordances of ChatGPT usage for college students’ learning. Media and Communication, 13. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.9508

Lim, W. M. (2025). What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 33(2), 199–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619

Loyens, S. M. M., Magda, J., & Rikers, R. M. J. P. (2008). Self-directed learning in problem-based learning and its relationships with self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 411–427.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9082-7

Lubis, A. H., Ayuningsih, A. S., & Ikaputri, S. R. (2024). A systematic literature review of ChatGPT utilization in education: Potentials and concerns. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education (ICOLLITE 2023), Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 38–44. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-376-4

Marquardson, J. (2024). Embracing artificial intelligence to improve self-directed learning: A cybersecurity classroom study. Information Systems Education Journal, 22(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.62273/wzby3952

Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2016). Designing qualitative research (6th ed.).

Matta, C. (2022). Philosophical paradigms in qualitative research methods education: What is their pedagogical role? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66(6), 1049–1062. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2021.1958372

Mentz, E., Beer, J. de, & Bailey, R. (2019). Self-directed learning for the 21st century: Implications for higher education. (Vol. 1). https://doi.org/10.4102/aosis.2019.bk134.01

Miller, E. M., Porter, J. E., & Barbagallo, M. S. (2023). Simplifying qualitative case study research methodology: A step-by-step guide using a palliative care example. The Qualitative Report, 28(8), 2363–2379.

Mirhosseini, S.-A. (2020). Doing qualitative research in language education.

Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., Fernández-Batanero, J. M., & López-Meneses, E. (2023). Impact of the Implementation of ChatGPT in education: A systematic review. Computers, 12(8), 1–13.

Morell-Mengual, V., Fernández-García, O., Berenguer, C., Ortega-Barón, J., Gil-Llario, M. D., & Estruch-García, V. (2025). Characteristics, motivations and attitudes of students using ChatGPT and other language model-based chatbots in higher education. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13650-1

Mushafiyyah, M., Priajana, N., & Ikawati, L. (2025). An exploration of the implementation of technology-enhanced language learning (TELL) through the community of inquiry (COI) framework: Pre-service english teachers’ perspectives. Journal of English Educational Study (JEES), 8(2), 224–233.

OECD. (2023). OECD Digital Education Outlook 2023: Towards an effective digital education ecosystem. In OECD Publishing, Paris. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/oecd-digital-education-outlook-2023_c74f03de-en

Olivier, J. (2020). Self-directed multimodal learning in higher education. In NWU Self-Directed Learning Series (Vol. 5). https://books.aosis.co.za/index.php/ob/catalog/book/210

Olivier, J., du Toit-Brits, C., J. Bunt, B., & Dhakulkar, A. (2022). Contextualised open educational practices: Towards student agency and self-directed learning. https://doi.org/10.4102/aosis.2022.BK345

Oranga, J., & Matere, A. (2023). Qualitative research: Essence, types and advantages. Open Access Library Journal, 10, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1111001

Pradana, M., Elisa, H. P., & Syarifuddin, S. (2023). Discussing ChatGPT in education: A literature review and bibliometric analysis. cogent education, 10(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2243134

Rahman, M. M., & Watanobe, Y. (2023). ChatGPT for education and research: Opportunities, threats, and strategies. Applied Sciences, 13(9), 1–21.

Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the COVID-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science and Education, 2, 923–945.

Roe, J., & Perkins, M. (2024). Generative AI and agency in education: A critical scoping review and thematic analysis. 1–19.

Ronanki, K., Cabrero-Daniel, B., & Berger, C. (2023). ChatGPT as a tool for user story quality evaluation: Trustworthy out of the box? Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48550-3_17

Sain, Z. H., Vasudevan, A., Thelma, C. C., & Asfahani. (2024). Harnessing ChatGPT for effective assessment and feedback in education. Journal of Computer Science And Informatics Engineering (CoSIE), 3(2), 74–82.

Sevnarayan, K. (2024). Exploring the dynamics of ChatGPT: Students and lecturers’ perspectives at an open distance e-learning. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(2), 212–226.

Shrestha, P., & Bhattarai, P. C. (2022). Application of case study methodology in the exploration of inclusion in education. 6(1), 73–84.

Syarifudin, M. N., Wibawanto, H., & Syamwil, R. (2019). Journal of vocational career education the development of self directed learning model (SDL) for basic competence in analyzing video, animation and/or digital music. Journal of Vocational Career Education, 4(2), 109–116.

Syuhra, M. N., Chandra, N. E., & Rosalina, E. (2025). Artificial intelligence in english language teaching: A systematic literature review of tools, impact, and challenges. VELES (Voices of English Language Education Society), 9(1), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v9i1.29745

Tonder, G. P. Van, Kloppers, M. M., & Grosser, M. M. (2022). Enabling self-directed academic and personal wellbeing through cognitive education. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.789194

Viorennita, A., Dewi, L., & Riyana, C. (2023). The role of ChatGPT AI in student learning experience. Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(2), 445–452.

Wang, C., Li, Z., & Bonk, C. (2024). Understanding self-directed learning in AI-assisted writing: A mixed methods study of postsecondary learners. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 1–10.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100247

Wang, H., Dang, A., Wu, Z., & Mac, S. (2024). Generative AI in higher education: Seeing ChatGPT through universities’ policies, resources, and guidelines. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100326

Yan, L., Sha, L., Zhao, L., Li, Y., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Chen, G., Li, X., Jin, Y., & Gašević, D. (2023). Practical and ethical challenges of large language models in education: A systematic scoping review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13370

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.).

Younas, M., Abdel Salam El-Dakhs, D., & Jiang, Y. (2025). A comprehensive systematic review of ai-driven approaches to self-directed learning. IEEE Access, 13, 38387–38403. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3546319

Yusop, E. M. (2024). The effect of ChatGPT in fostering self-directed learning in the ESL writing classroom. SJLE, 3(2), 223–232.

Yusuf, A., Pervin, N., & Román-González, M. (2024). Generative AI and the future of higher education: A threat to academic integrity or reformation? Evidence from multicultural perspectives. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(21), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00453-6




DOI: 10.24235/ath.v35i2.25694

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 AL-TARBIYAH: Jurnal Pendidikan (The Educational Journal)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Owner: Juice

slot88

slot88

https://nierika.ibero.mx/

https://mktdescubre.espoch.edu.ec/

https://revistas.polinorte.edu.co/

https://nota4dplus.xyz/

https://nota4dhub.xyz/

https://ijtmr.ktu.edu.gh/

https://journal.p2ti.com/

https://beritagenz.com

Tips Buy Feature Paling Untung di Gates of Olympus

Kisah Pemain Menang 4 Juta di Sweet Bonanza

Cara Masuk Free Spin Lebih Cepat di Mahjong Ways 2

Publikasi dari ojs.elte.hu : Jam Gacor Hari Ini di Starlight Princess

Cerita Kemenangan Konsisten di Koi Gate

Cerita Tukang Bakso di Banten WD 2 Juta dari Power of Thor — Modal Receh, Hasil Bikin Kaget

Dosen UIN Banten Bongkar Cara Meningkatkan Peluang Menang di Gates of Olympus

Dosen UIN Banten Bongkar Rahasia Main Bigger Bass Bonanza, Pemula Auto Paham

Tukang Tambal Ban Asal Banten Ini WD 4 Juta Bermodal 25K di Mahjong Ways 2, Bikin Heboh Warga

Cerita Mahasiswa UIN Banten Dapat 3 Juta dari Sweet Bonanza Modal Cuma 20K

Dalam 1 Jam, Pedagang Asal Banten Kantongi 5 Juta dari Wild West Gold — Begini Ceritanya

Kuli Bangunan WD 5 Juta Bermodal 25K di Gates of Olympus Awalnya Cuma Iseng Saat Istirahat

Tukang Bakso Asal Banten WD 6 Juta Bermodal 30K di Wild West Gold

Penjual Gorengan di Banten Cerita Momen Tak Terlupa Saat Menang 6 Juta di Sweet Bonanza