Refleksi Humanisme dalam Perspektif Erich Fromm berbasis Penelitian Pengembangan Modul Ajar Pendidikan Nilai dan Karakter Berbantuan Artificial Intelligence

Indra Gunawan(1), Fuad Nawawi(2), Fauzan Akbar Novianto(3*),


(1) UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
(2) UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
(3) UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


ABSTRAK: Perkembangan Artificial Intelligence (AI) dalam pendidikan menghadirkan peluang sekaligus tantangan bagi pendidikan nilai dan karakter. Artikel ini bertujuan merefleksikan penggunaan AI dalam pendidikan nilai dari perspektif humanisme Erich Fromm dengan berpijak pada hasil penelitian pengembangan modul pembelajaran berbasis AI pada mata kuliah Teori Pendidikan Nilai dan Karakter. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan pijakan penelitian dan pengembangan terdahulu yang menerapkan metode Research and Development (R&D) melalui model Educational Design Research (EDR). Data empiris dianalisis melalui refleksi filosofis dengan menggunakan konsep being, having, dan automaton conformity dari Erich Fromm. Hasil refleksi menunjukkan bahwa AI tidak bersifat dehumanisasi apabila digunakan sebagai medium reflektif dan dialogis, bukan sebagai pengganti peran pendidik. Sebaliknya, AI dapat memperkuat proses pemaknaan nilai, kesadaran diri, dan tanggung jawab moral peserta didik ketika diintegrasikan dalam kerangka pedagogi humanistik. Artikel ini juga menegaskan bahwa peran pendidik tetap sentral sebagai subjek pedagogis dan penjaga orientasi nilai, sementara AI berfungsi sebagai mitra pedagogis yang mendukung pembelajaran reflektif. Secara teoretis, artikel ini berkontribusi pada pengembangan kajian filsafat pendidikan dengan menawarkan kerangka humanisme reflektif sebagai dasar etis penggunaan AI dalam pendidikan nilai dan karakter di era digital.


ABSTRACT: The development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education presents both opportunities and challenges for value and character education. This article aims to reflect on the use of AI in value education from the perspective of Erich Fromm’s humanism, grounded in the results of developmental research on an AI-based learning module implemented in the Theory of Value and Character Education course. The study adopts a qualitative approach, drawing upon prior Research and Development (R&D) employing the Educational Design Research (EDR) model. Empirical data are examined through a philosophical reflection using Erich Fromm’s concepts of being, having, and automaton conformity. The reflection reveals that AI is not inherently dehumanizing when positioned as a reflective and dialogical medium rather than as a substitute for educators. Instead, AI can enhance the process of value formation, self-awareness, and moral responsibility when integrated within a humanistic pedagogical framework. The article further emphasizes that educators remain central as pedagogical subjects and guardians of value orientation, while AI functions as a pedagogical partner that supports reflective learning. Theoretically, this study contributes to the field of philosophy of education by proposing a reflective humanistic framework as an ethical foundation for the use of AI in value and character education in the digital era.


Keywords


Pendidikan Nilai; Pendidikan Karakter; Artificial Intelligence; Humanisme Erich Fromm.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bey, Valentinus. “Fenomena Artificial Intelligence dan Bahaya Dehumanisasi (Analisis Kritis Terhadap Fenomena AI Berdasarkan Pandangan Herbert Marcuse).” AKADEMIKA : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa 23, no. 1 (2024): 54–63. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.31385/jakad.v23i1.11.

Chan, Cecilia Ka Yuk, dan Louisa H.Y. Tsi. “Will Generative AI Replace Teachers in Higher Education? A Study of Teacher and Student Perceptions.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 83 (2023). https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101395.

Dreyfus, Hubert L. On the internet. Routledge, 2008.

Fan, Yizhou, Luzhen Tang, Huixiao Le, Kejie Shen, Shufang Tan, Yueying Zhao, Yuan Shen, Xinyu Li, dan Dragan Gašević. “Beware of Metacognitive Laziness: Effects of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Learning Motivation, Processes, and Performance.” British Journal of Educational Technology 56, no. 2 (2024): 489–530. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13544.

Freire, Paulo. “Pedagogy of the oppressed.” In Toward a sociology of education, 374–86. Routledge, 2020.

Fromm, Erich. “Escape from Freedom. Farrar and Rinehart.” Inc., New York, 1941, 1–3.

———. “Mendidik si Automaton.” In Menggugat Pendidikan, diedit oleh Omi Intan Naomi, VIII. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2015.

———. “The heart of man: Its genius for good and evil.” Inc., New York, 1941, 1–3.

———. To have or to be? A&C Black, 2013.

Gunawan, Indra, Fuad Nawawi, dan Silfa Tamami Solihati. “Landasan Filosofis Kurikulum Merdeka dan Implikasinya terhadap Tugas Akhir Non-Skripsi di Prodi Aqidah Dan Filsafat Islam UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati.” Indonesian Journal of Education and Learning 8, no. 2 (2025): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.31002/ijel.v8i2.2130.

Han, Byung-Chul. Psychopolitics: Neoliberalism and new technologies of power. Verso Books, 2017.

Holmes, Wayne, Kaska Porayska-Pomsta, Ken Holstein, Emma Sutherland, Toby Baker, Simon Buckingham Shum, Olga C. Santos, et al. “Ethics of AI in Education: Towards a Community-Wide Framework.” Int J Artif Intell Educ 32 (2021): 504–26. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1.

Luckin, Rosemary. Machine Learning and Human Intelligence. The future of education for the 21st century. UCL institute of education press, 2018.

McKenney, Susan, dan Thomas Reeves. Conducting educational design research. Routledge, 2018.

Miller, Andrew. “Social justice and education in the 21st century,” 2008.

Nadya, Revalya, Ika Amalia, dan Ichsan Fauzi Rachman. “Analisis Potensi dan Tantangan dalam Penggunaan AI di Bidang Pendidikan.” Semantik : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa Dan Budaya 3, no. 2 (2025): 295–309. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.61132/semantik.v3i2.1705.

Phenix, Phillip H. Realms of Meaning: A Philosophy of the Curriculum for General Education. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1964.

Rombout, F., J.A. Schuitema, dan M.L.L. Volman. “Teaching Strategies for Value-Loaded Critical Thinking in Philosophy Classroom Dialogues.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 43, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100991).

Rudolph, Jurgen, Samson Tan, dan Shannon Tan. “ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?” Journal of applied learning & teaching 6, no. 1 (2023): 342–63.

Selwyn, Neil. Should robots replace teachers?: AI and the future of education. John Wiley & Sons, 2019.

Tasioulas, John. “Artificial Intelligence, Humanistic Ethics.” Daedalus 151, no. 2 (2022): 232–43. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01912.

Zuboff, Shoshana. “The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at




DOI: 10.24235/jy.v11i2.23726

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Jurnal Yaqzhan: Analisis Filsafat, Agama dan Kemanusiaan Indexed By:

                          

 

EDITORIAL OFFICE:

UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon. Perjuangan Street of Sunyaragi, Cirebon City, West Java, Indonesia 45132 Phone. 0231-489926.

 

Jurnal Yaqzhan: Analisis Filsafat, Agama dan Kemanusiaan is licensed under a Creative Commons 4.0 International License.