Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Diya al-Afkar is published by department of Quranic Studies, Islamic State University Syekh Nurjati Cirebon. The journal accepts submissions of manuscripts from any issues related to quranic and hadith studies, such as 'ulum al-Quran, 'lum al-Hadith, tafsir, living al-Quran, contemporary perspective on quranic and hadith, etc.

 

Jurnal Diya al-Afkar diterbitkan oleh Program Studi Ilmu al-Qur'an dan Tafsir IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon. Jurnal ini menerima artikel-artikel dari berbagai isu berkaitan dengan kajian al-Quran dan Hadis, seperti 'Ulum al-Quran, 'Ulum al-Hadith, Tafsir, Living al-Quran, pemikiran kontemporer terhadap al-Qur'an dan Hadis, dan sebagainya.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Papers are blindly reviewed by experts and specialits in Quranic and Hadith studies as well as interdisciplinary approach . When a paper past an initial review, it will be reviewed by at least two reviewers. The reviewers used our review guidelines to judge your paper. We will let you know as soon as the reviews are done.

Artikel direview oleh beberapa ahli dalam kajian al-Quran dan Hadis dengan menggunakan pendekatan interdisipliner. Review ini dilakukan secara blind review untuk memastikan netralitas kritik dan masukan. Setiap naskah yang dikirim akan direview minimal oleh dua orang reviewer dalam yang terdiri atas editor Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Quran dan Hadis; dan reviewer luar yang berkontribusi bagi Jurnal ini.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Publication Ethics

Publication Ethic and Malpractice Statement

Diya al-Afkar: Jurnal Studi al-Qur’an dan al-Hadis is a peer-reviewed journal, published twice a year by the Department of Quranic Studies and Tafsir, Faculty of Ushuluddin Adab and Dakwah, Islamic State University Syekh Nurjat Cirebon. It is available online as open access sources as well as in print. This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the editor-in-chief, the Editorial Board, the reviewer, and the publisher. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

 

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article Diya al-Afkar: Jurnal Studi al-Qur’an dan al-Hadis is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific methods. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the editor, the reviewer, the publisher, and the society. As the publisher of Diya al-Afkar: Jurnal Studi al-Qur’an dan al-Hadis, the Department of of Quranic Studies and Tafsir takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing seriously and it recognizes its ethical and other responsibilities. The Department of of Quranic Studies and Tafsir committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.

 

Publication Decisions

The editors of Diya al-Afkar: Jurnal Studi al-Qur’an dan al-Hadis is responsible for deciding which articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making their decisions.

 

Plagiarism Screening

It is basically author’s duty to only submit a manuscript that is free from plagiarism and academically malpractices. The editor, however, double checks each article before its publication. The first step is to check plagiarism against offline database developed byThe Department of Tafsir and Hadis and, secondly, against as much as possible online databases.

 

Fair Play

An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

 

Confidentiality

The editors and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

 

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in editors' own research without the express written consent of the author.

 

 

 

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editors in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the authors may also assist the author in improving the quality of the paper.

 

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editors and excuse himself from the review process.

 

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

 

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

 

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by a proper citation. A reviewer should also call to the editors' attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

 

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with any of the authors, companies, or institutions related to the papers.

 

Review Process

Every manuscript submitted to Diya al-Afkar: Jurnal Studi al-Qur’an dan al-Hadis is independently reviewed by at least two reviewers in the form of "double-blind review". Decision for publication, amendment, or rejection is based upon their reports/recommendation. In certain cases, the editor may submit an article for review to another, third reviewer before making a decision, if necessary.

 

 

 

Duties of Authors

 

Reporting Standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

 

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

 

Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

 

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

 

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported research. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

 

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

 

Fundamental errors in Published Works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper

 

 

 

Publication Charge

Article Charges

No Charge for every Article Submission Charge 

Article Publication

If manuscript is accepted for publication, an author will get two printed journal.

Publication Fee: FREE (IDR 500.000,-/article will be payable after the author gets honorarium as an author; honorarium author limited to Ten published articles. The pages that are calculated outside the abstract and bibliography)

 

Screening for Plagiarism

To check the possibility of plagiarism, using the application Plagiarism Checker X.

The article must below 20% of plagiarism.

Plagiarism include:

  1. Word for word Plagiarism. The author uses the words of other authors (exactly) without mentioning the source. 
  2. Plagiarism over the source. The author uses the idea of others without giving enough recognition (without mentioning the source expressly).
  3. Plagiarism of Authorship. The author acknowledged as the author of the paperwork of others.
  4. Self Plagiarism. Included in this type are authors publish one article in more than one editor of the publication. And recycle paper/papers. That is important in self-plagiarism is that when taking his own works, then the creation of new works produced must have a meaningful change. This means that the old Works is a small part of the new works were produced. So readers will get new stuff, which is really the author of pour on the paper using the old paper.