Comparing Student Problem-Solving in Math: Double-Loop vs. Multi-Representational Discourse Models

Dewi Anjani(1*), Nurma Izzati(2),


(1) IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
(2) IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This research was conducted at SMP Negeri 7 Cirebon with quantitative methods. Quasi-Experimental research design in the form of posttest-only control group design. This research uses a purposive sampling technique to determine the research sample. The population in this study were all class VIII SMP Negeri 7 Cirebon. The samples used were class VIII B consisting of 36 students and class VIII D consists of 36 students. Data collection technique uses a test instrument in the form of a posttest in the form of a description. The results showed that there was a significant difference between the application of the double loop problem-solving learning model and the multi representation discourse learning model on students' mathematical problem solving abilities with a significance value of 0,001 less than 0,05 (< 0,05). This difference can also be seen from the results of calculating the average mathematical problem solving ability in the experimental class 1 which applies the double loop problem solving learning model of 75,89 while in experimental class 2 which applies the multi representation discourse learning model of 64,34. So, it can be concluded that the mathematical problem solving abilities of students who apply the double loop problem solving learning model are better than the mathematical problem solving abilities of students who apply the multi-representation discourse learning model to the Pythagorean theorem material


Keywords


Double Loop; Problem Solving; Multi Representation Discourse; Mathematical; Problem Solving Abilities

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abraham, I., & Supriyati, Y. (2022). Desain Kuasi Eksperimen Dalam Pendidikan: Literatur Review. Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education, 8(3), 2476–2482. https://doi.org/10.58258/jime.v8i3.3800

Agustina, T., Sukmana, N., & Rahmawati, D. (2019). Penerapan Model Diskursus Multi Representasi ( DMR ) untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa. Educare, 17(2), 151–158.

Amaliyah AR, R., & Mahmud, N. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematis dalam Pemecahan Masalah Geometri serta Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika, 3(2), 146–160. https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2018.3.2.146-160

Asih, N., & Ramdhani, S. (2019). Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis dan Kemandirian Belajar Siswa Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Means End Analysis. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(3), 435–446. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v8i3.534

Fitria, N. F. N., Hidayani, N., Hendriana, H., & Amelia, R. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematik Siswa SMP dengan Materi Segitiga dan Segiempat 4 Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, IKIP Siliwangi Bandung. Edumatica, 08(April), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v8i01.4728

Hasanah, A., Sahrodi, J., & Handoko, H. (2022). ARIAS Model in Mathematics Learning Based on Inquiry Ability of Students in Problem Solving. Objective, 1(1), 31–40. https://journal.metaskrip.com/index.php/objective/article/view/9

Herdiana, L., Zakiah, N. E., & Sunaryo, Y. (2021). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Diskursus Multy Reprecentacy (Dmr) Terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematis Siswa. J-KIP (Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan), 2(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.25157/j-kip.v2i1.4784

Imam, I., Ayubi, A., & Bernard, M. (2018). Matematis Siswa Sma. JPMI:Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 1(3), 355–360. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v1i3.355-360

Layali, N. K. M. (2020). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis melalui model treffinger di SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Raflesia, 05(02), 137–144.

Maryanti, S. (2018). Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Co-Op Co-Op dengan Pendekatan Predict-Observe-Explain untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 1(3), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.24042/djm.v1i3.2680

Muhammad, M., & Purwanto, J. (2020). The effect of Double Loop Problem Solving (DLPS) on critical thinking skills and mathematical problem solving abilities. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1469(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1469/1/012172

Muhlisin, A., Sarwanti, S., Jalunggono, G., Yusliwidaka, A., Mazid, S., & Mohtar, L. E. (2022). Improving students’ problem-solving skills through RIAS model in science classes. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 41(1), 284–294. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v41i1.47263

Nasution, S. R., & Mujib, A. (2022). Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis dan Kemandirian Belajar Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 6(1), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v6i1.1850

Nurfaisah, Tayeb, T., Nur, F., Latuconsina, N. K., & Mattoliang, L. A. (2021). Student Math Problem Solving Skills through Multi-Representation Discourse Type Cooperative Model Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Peserta didik melalui Model Kooperatif Tipe Diskursus Multi Representasi. Alauddin Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(1), 53–61.

Pratama, O. I., & Suherman, S. (2018). Pembelajaran Double Loop Problem Solving Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 1(3), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.24042/djm.v1i3.2661

Ramadhana, L. R., Karim, K., & Amalia, R. (2018). Pengaruh Model Double Loop Problem Solving (Dlps) Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Smp. EDU-MAT: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 210–217. https://doi.org/10.20527/edumat.v6i2.5685

Rukiyah, S., Widiyastuti, R., Islam, U., Raden, N., Lampung, I., & Matematis, K. R. (2020). Sparkol Videoscribe Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Representasi Matematis. EduSains, 8(2), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.23971/eds.v8i2.1565

Sutama, S. (2018). Mathematic Learning Based on Double Loop Learning to Improve Critical Thinking and Problem Solving Skill Student. Proceeding of The Progressive and Fun Education International Conference, 1(22), 1–6. http://repository.profunedu.id/index.php/proceeding/article/view/8

Tama, A. M., Rinaldi, A., & Andriani, S. (2018). Pemahaman Konsep Peserta Didik dengan Menggunakan Graded Response Models (GRM). Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 1(1), 91. https://doi.org/10.24042/djm.v1i1.2041

Widhy Adnyana, P. G., Suarsana, I. M., & Putu Suharta, I. G. (2021). Multi-Representation Discourse Model and Math Problem Solving Skills of High School Students. Journal of Learning Improvement and Lesson Study, 1(1), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.24036/jlils.v1i1.8




DOI: 10.24235/eduma.v12i2.13965

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 48 times
PDF - 12 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2023

toto

slot

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787 href="https://www.happycyclist.org/">SUNDA787 Online SITUS SUNDA787SUNDA787 DaftarSUNDA787 ViralSUNDA787 MaxwinSUNDA787 LoginSUNDA787 Slotslot spadegamingslot onlineslot resmislot hari inislot gacorgacor7selotgacorsitus slotsitus slot gacorslot maxwinslot jackpot maxwin x1000jackpot maxwin x1000judi gameslot shopeepayslot bri onlineslot jackpotslot x500 maxwinslot online terlengkap

slot gacor

slot88

slot online

agen sbobet terpercaya

agen sbobet terpercaya

Login Alternatif 3DSbobet

slot terpercaya

slot gacor hari ini

link slot thailand

slot gacor

slot gacor

situs slot gacor

slot online

maxslot88

slot

demo slot

binus4d

slot88

slot demo

slot gacor

slot gacor

sendok88

toto slot

slot

idnslot

kadang pemahaman baru muncul setelah mahjong ways dijalani pelan mahjong ways sering terlihat berbeda ketika fokus berubah bukan soal cepat atau lambat mahjong ways mengajak membaca alur di tengah permainan yang mengalir mahjong ways menyimpan makna mahjong ways akhirnya dipahami sebagai proses yang berlapis persepsi sering berubah setelah mahjong wins dilihat lebih dalam mahjong wins kadang dipahami dari cara berpikir bukan hasil ada alur tenang yang terbentuk saat mahjong wins dibiarkan mengalir mahjong wins muncul dalam bentuk pengalaman bukan kejutan dari sudut yang jarang diperhatikan mahjong wins terasa nyata ada banyak cara memaknai rtp tergantung sudut pandang pengamat dalam pengamatan jangka panjang rtp memiliki cerita sendiri di balik angka rtp terkadang tersimpan pola pemahaman melihat rtp sebagai bagian dari gambaran yang lebih besar rtp bukan sekadar rujukan namun bagian dari proses berpikir rtp kerap muncul dalam diskusi saat pengalaman mulai dibandingkan rtp menjadi menarik saat dibaca tanpa ekspektasi berlebihan rtp sering dipahami berbeda ketika konteksnya ikut diperhatikan rtp terasa berbeda ketika dilihat dalam alur yang utuh rtp tidak selalu berbicara angka kadang soal pola pikir

slot gacor hari ini

Petugas Administrasi Rumah Sakit Pekanbaru Temukan Celah Cuan Lewat Game Big Bass Bonanza

Yuantoto

LGO234

Slot Gacor

<a style="visibility: hid