Analyzing Students' Cognitive Process of Mathematical Problem Solving for Mathematical Literacy

Setiyani Setiyani(1*), Nurul Ikhsan Karimah(2), Trusti Hapsari(3), Sri Sumarwati(4), Turini Erawati(5), Try Suprayo(6),


(1) Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati
(2) Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati
(3) Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati
(4) Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati
(5) Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati
(6) Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Math education aims to develop thinking skills and promote problem-solving using math. Unfortunately, students often find it dull, leading them to rely on memorization instead of grasping concepts. Mathematical literacy involves using math in everyday situations, requiring reasoning and concept application. This study used a descriptive qualitative method to explore how eighth-grade students approach math literacy problems from a cognitive perspective. The instruments used in this research include tests, interviews, observations, and documentation. Subjects were chosen by giving numeracy problems to 25 AKM program participants, and then three subjects were selected for in-depth interviews based on cognitive level. Data analysis involved data reduction, examining results and semi-structured interview responses for verbal expressions of thinking processes related to math literacy at different cognitive levels. Based on the results of this research, subjects with high abilities demonstrated a deep understanding of the problems, organized information very well, used prior knowledge and experience to make attempts, and engaged in reflection and evaluation of the answers obtained. In summary, students with varying cognitive levels showed good math literacy skills, as evidenced by all three subjects successfully meeting the descriptors of the thinking process when solving math literacy problems

Keywords


Mathematical thinking process; matematics literacy problems; Cognitive levels

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahyar, H., Andriani, H., & Sukmana, D. J. (2020). Buku Metode Penelitian Kualitatif & Kuantitatif (Issue March). CV. Pustaka Ilmu.

Anggraini, K. E., & Setianingsih, R. (2022). Analisis kemampuan numerasi siswa sma dalam menyelesaikan soal asesmen kompetensi minimum (AKM). MATHEdunesa, 11(3), 837–849. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v11n3.p837-849

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktek. Pustaka Pelajar.

Ayuningtyas, N. (2013). Proses penyelesaian soal higher order thinking materi aljabar siswa SMP ditinjau berdasarkan kemampuan matematika siswa. Mathedunesa, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v2n2.p%25p

Azwar, S. (2012). Penyusunan skala psikologi (2nd). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Azzahra, R. H., & Pujiastuti, H. (2020). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa pada materi sistem persamaan linear tiga variabel. Transformasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika, 4(1), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.36526/tr.v4i1.876

Booth, J. L., Lange, K. E., Koedinger, K. R., & Newton, K. J. (2013). Using example problems to improve student learning in algebra: Differentiating between correct and incorrect examples. Learning and Instruction, 25, 24–34. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.11.002

Burton, L. (1984). Mathematical thinking: The struggle for meaning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.2307/748986

Candrama, M. M. T., Darmawan, P., & Basri, H. (2023). Berpikir Siswa SMA dalam Memecahkan Masalah AKM Numerasi Bangun Ruang Sisi Lengkung Berdasarkan Teori Dual-Process. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika (JRPIPM), 7(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpipm.v7n1.p1-25

Fani, F. L., Mariani, S., & Agoestanto, A. (2023). Problem Based Learning (PBL) with Scaffolding Approach to Improve Students’ Mathematical Literacy. EduMa: Mathematics Education Learning and Teachingâ€â€â€Ž, 12(2), 235–247. http://dx.doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v12i2.14117

Ferdianto, F., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., & Widowati, I. J. (2022). Mathematical Thinking Process On Numeracy Literacy Problems For Middle School Students. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(8), 6909–6923. Retrieved from https://journalppw.com/index.php/jpsp/article/view/11007

Fouze, A. Q., & Amit, M. (2017). Development of mathematical thinking through integration of ethnomathematic folklore game in math instruction. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(2), 617–630. https://10.12973/ejmste/80626

Hasanah, S. I., Tafrilyanto, C. F., & Aini, Y. (2019). Mathematical Reasoning: The characteristics of students’ mathematical abilities in problem solving. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188(1), 12057. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/link_gateway/2019JPhCS1188a2057I/doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012057

Hayati, T. R., & Kamid, K. (2019). Analysis of mathematical literacy processes in high school students. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 2(3), 116–119. https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v2i3.70

Lerman, S. (2020). Encyclopedia of mathematics education. Springer.

Liu, Y., & Ginther, D. (1999). Cognitive styles and distance education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 2(3), 1–17.

Maslihah, S., Waluya, S. B., & Suyitno, A. (2020). The role of mathematical literacy to improve high order thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1539(1), 12085. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/link_gateway/2020JPhCS1539a2085M/doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1539/1/012085

Miftah, R., Herman, T., & Kurniawat, L. (2021). Students’thinking Process in Solving Mathematical Literacy Problem Based on Cognitive Style.

Muhtadin, A. (2020). Defragmenting Struktur Berpikir Melalui Refleksi untuk Memperbaiki Kesalahan Siswa Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita. Primatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.30872/primatika.v9i1.248

Oljayevna, O., & Shavkatovna, S. (2020). The Development of Logical Thinking of Primary School Students in Mathematics. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences, 8(2), 235–239.

Owusu, A. (2023). Problem Based Learning: Errors Minimization, Conceptual and Procedural Understanding in Trigonometry. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences, 19(1), 1–18. Retrieved from https://journals.uew.edu.gh/index.php/ajesms/article/view/199

Rahmatiya, R., & Miatun, A. (2020). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis ditinjau dari resiliensi matematis siswa SMP. Teorema: Teori Dan Riset Matematika, 5(2), 187–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/teorema.v5i2.3619

Sari, R. H. N., & Wijaya, A. (2017). Mathematical literacy of senior high school students in Yogyakarta. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 100–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v4i1.10649

Stacey, K. (2006). What is mathematical thinking and why is it important. Progress Report of the APEC Project: Collaborative Studies on Innovations for Teaching and Learning Mathematics in Different Cultures (II)—Lesson Study Focusing on Mathematical Thinking.

Stacey, K., Burton, L., & Mason, J. (1982). Thinking mathematically. Addison-Wesley.

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sukmawati, S., Saumi, T. F., & Nasrullah, A. (2020). Camtasia-assisted computer statistics application practicum learning video in online classes to improve students’ mathematical understanding. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1657(1), 12016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012016

Supiarmo, M. G., Mardhiyatirrahmah, L., & Turmudi, T. (2021). Pemberian scaffolding untuk memperbaiki proses berpikir komputasional siswa dalam memecahkan masalah matematika. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 368–382. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v5i1.516

Tabun, H. M., Taneo, P. N. L., & Daniel, F. (2020). The Ability of Student Math Literation on Problem Based Learning Model. EduMa: Mathematics Education Learning and Teachingâ€â€â€Ž, 9(1), 43–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v9i1.6036

Wulandari, S., Sari, C. K., Nurcahyo, A., & Setyaningsih, R. (2023). Literasi Matematika Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Hots. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 6(3), 1033–1044. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v6i3.17581




DOI: 10.24235/eduma.v13i1.16272

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 54 times
PDF - 7 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2024 EduMa: Mathematics education learning and teaching‏‏‎

toto

slot

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787 href="https://www.happycyclist.org/">SUNDA787 Online SITUS SUNDA787SUNDA787 DaftarSUNDA787 ViralSUNDA787 MaxwinSUNDA787 LoginSUNDA787 Slotslot spadegamingslot onlineslot resmislot hari inislot gacorgacor7selotgacorsitus slotsitus slot gacorslot maxwinslot jackpot maxwin x1000jackpot maxwin x1000judi gameslot shopeepayslot bri onlineslot jackpotslot x500 maxwinslot online terlengkap

slot gacor

slot88

slot online

agen sbobet terpercaya

agen sbobet terpercaya

Login Alternatif 3DSbobet

slot terpercaya

slot gacor hari ini

link slot thailand

slot gacor

slot gacor

situs slot gacor

slot online

maxslot88

slot

demo slot

binus4d

slot88

slot demo

slot gacor

slot gacor

sendok88

toto slot

slot

idnslot

kadang pemahaman baru muncul setelah mahjong ways dijalani pelan mahjong ways sering terlihat berbeda ketika fokus berubah bukan soal cepat atau lambat mahjong ways mengajak membaca alur di tengah permainan yang mengalir mahjong ways menyimpan makna mahjong ways akhirnya dipahami sebagai proses yang berlapis persepsi sering berubah setelah mahjong wins dilihat lebih dalam mahjong wins kadang dipahami dari cara berpikir bukan hasil ada alur tenang yang terbentuk saat mahjong wins dibiarkan mengalir mahjong wins muncul dalam bentuk pengalaman bukan kejutan dari sudut yang jarang diperhatikan mahjong wins terasa nyata ada banyak cara memaknai rtp tergantung sudut pandang pengamat dalam pengamatan jangka panjang rtp memiliki cerita sendiri di balik angka rtp terkadang tersimpan pola pemahaman melihat rtp sebagai bagian dari gambaran yang lebih besar rtp bukan sekadar rujukan namun bagian dari proses berpikir rtp kerap muncul dalam diskusi saat pengalaman mulai dibandingkan rtp menjadi menarik saat dibaca tanpa ekspektasi berlebihan rtp sering dipahami berbeda ketika konteksnya ikut diperhatikan rtp terasa berbeda ketika dilihat dalam alur yang utuh rtp tidak selalu berbicara angka kadang soal pola pikir

slot gacor hari ini

Petugas Administrasi Rumah Sakit Pekanbaru Temukan Celah Cuan Lewat Game Big Bass Bonanza

Yuantoto

LGO234

Slot Gacor

<a style="visibility: hid