Analysis of Students' Errors in Solving the Least Common Multiple and Greatest Common Divisor Word Problems

Ana Puji Lestari(1*), Inti Nahdataeni S(2),


(1) Universitas Negeri Malang
(2) SMP IT Al-Fahmi Palu
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Students' ability to solve word problems has an essential role in learning mathematics. However, some junior high school students still have difficulty in solving word problems. The difficulties experienced by students cause errors when solving mathematical word problems. This qualitative study aims to analyze students' errors in solving the Least Common Multiple and Greatest Common Divisor word problems. Fifty-nine students of Integrated Islamic Junior High School Al-Fahmi in Palu were involved in this study. Two students were selected to participate in the interview process. The interview was conducted to obtain in-depth information about how students solve word problems and the types of errors experienced by students. Students' errors in solving word problems were analyzed based on Newman's theory. The errors experienced by students are comprehension errors, transformation errors, process skills errors, and encoding errors

Keywords


Newman error analysis; least common multiple; greatest common divisor; word problem

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agustiani, N. (2021). Analyzing Students’ Errors in Solving Sequence and Series Application Problems Using Newman Procedure. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 5(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v5i1.17377

Boonen, A. J. H., de Koning, B. B., Jolles, J., & van der Schoot, M. (2016). Word Problem Solving in Contemporary Math Education: A Plea for Reading Comprehension Skills Training. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00191

Clements, M. A. (1980). Analyzing children’s errors on written mathematical tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 11(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00369157

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage publications.

Csíkos, C., & Szitányi, J. (2020). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in teaching word problem solving strategies. ZDM, 52(1), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01115-y

Fitriani, H. N., Turmudi, T., & Prabawanto, S. (2018, December). Analysis of students error in mathematical problem solving based on Newman’s error analysis. In International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education of Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (Vol. 3, pp. 791-796).

Gonzálezâ€Castro, P., Cueli, M., Areces, D., Rodríguez, C., & Sideridis, G. (2016). Improvement of Word Problem Solving and Basic Mathematics Competencies in Students with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Mathematical Learning Difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 31(3), 142-155. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12106

Granberg, C. (2016). Discovering and addressing errors during mathematics problem-solving—A productive struggle? The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 42, 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.02.002

Han, C. T., Singh, P., Nasir, N. A. M., Ramly, M. A., & Hoon, T. S. (2016). Error in Solving Mathematical Word Problem: A Study of Preparatory Diploma Program. In C. Y. Fook, G. K. Sidhu, S. Narasuman, L. L. Fong, & S. B. Abdul Rahman (Eds.), 7th International Conference on University Learning and Teaching (InCULT 2014) Proceedings (pp. 399–408). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-664-5_32

Hu, Q., Son, J.-W., & Hodge, L. (2021). Algebra Teachers’ Interpretation and Responses to Student Errors in Solving Quadratic Equations. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10166-1

Jupri, A., & Drijvers, P. (2016). Student difficulties in mathematizing word problems in algebra. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9), 2481-2502. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1299a

Khalo, X., Bayaga, A., & Wadesango, N. (2015). Error Analysis: Case of Pre-service Teachers. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(2), 173–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2015.11890307

Powell, S. R., Berry, K. A., & Barnes, M. A. (2020). The role of pre-algebraic reasoning within a word-problem intervention for third-grade students with mathematics difficulty. ZDM, 52(1), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01093-1

Reid O’Connor, B., & Norton, S. (2020). Supporting indigenous primary students’ success in problem-solving: Learning from Newman interviews. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00345-8

Rushton, S. J. (2018). Teaching and learning mathematics through error analysis. Fields Mathematics Education Journal, 3(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40928-018-0009-y

Singh, P., Rahman, A. A., & Hoon, T. S. (2010). The Newman Procedure for Analyzing Primary Four Pupils Errors on Written Mathematical Tasks: A Malaysian Perspective. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.036

Slavin, R. E. (2018). Educational Psychology: Theory and practice.

Sukoriyanto, S., & Desmayanti, N. (2021, March). Analysis of student errors in solving linear programming problems based on Newman’s procedures in terms of writing mathematical communication capabilities. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2330, No. 1, p. 040002). AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043383

Trapsilasiwi, D., Murtikusuma, R. P., Oktavianingtyas, E., Wiliandani, I., & Widodo, D. M. (2021, May). Analysis of Introverted Students’ Error Based on Newman in Solving Arithmetic Sequences and Series Problems. In 1st International Conference on Mathematics and Mathematics Education (ICMMEd 2020) (pp. 371-375). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210508.090

Van Dooren, W., Lem, S., De Wortelaer, H., & Verschaffel, L. (2019). Improving realistic word problem solving by using humor. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 53, 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.06.008

Verschaffel, L., Schukajlow, S., Star, J., & Van Dooren, W. (2020). Word problems in mathematics education: A survey. ZDM, 52(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01130-4

White, A. L. (2005). Active mathematics in classrooms: Finding out why children make mistakes–and then doing something to help them. Square one, 15(4), 15-19.

Wijaya, A., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., Doorman, M., & Robitzsch, A. (2014). Difficulties in solving context-based PISA mathematics tasks: An analysis of students' errors. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 11(3), 555-584. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1317

Wong, T. T. Y., & Ho, C. S. H. (2017). Component processes in arithmetic word-problem solving and their correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(4), 520. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000149

Woodward, A., Beswick, K., & Oates, G. (2017). The four proficiency strands plus one?: Productive disposition and the Australian Curriculum: Mathematics. In 2017 Mathematical Association of Victoria Annual Conference (MAV17) (pp. 18-24). https://www.mav.vic.edu.au/files/2017/MAV17-Conference/Conference_Proceedings_011217.pdf




DOI: 10.24235/eduma.v11i2.9324

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 49 times
PDF - 10 times

Refbacks





Copyright (c) 2022 Eduma : Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching

toto

slot

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787 href="https://www.happycyclist.org/">SUNDA787 Online SITUS SUNDA787SUNDA787 DaftarSUNDA787 ViralSUNDA787 MaxwinSUNDA787 LoginSUNDA787 Slotslot spadegamingslot onlineslot resmislot hari inislot gacorgacor7selotgacorsitus slotsitus slot gacorslot maxwinslot jackpot maxwin x1000jackpot maxwin x1000judi gameslot shopeepayslot bri onlineslot jackpotslot x500 maxwinslot online terlengkap

slot gacor

slot88

slot online

agen sbobet terpercaya

agen sbobet terpercaya

Login Alternatif 3DSbobet

slot terpercaya

slot gacor hari ini

link slot thailand

slot gacor

slot gacor

situs slot gacor

slot online

maxslot88

slot

demo slot

binus4d

slot88

slot demo

slot gacor

slot gacor

sendok88

toto slot

slot

idnslot

kadang pemahaman baru muncul setelah mahjong ways dijalani pelan mahjong ways sering terlihat berbeda ketika fokus berubah bukan soal cepat atau lambat mahjong ways mengajak membaca alur di tengah permainan yang mengalir mahjong ways menyimpan makna mahjong ways akhirnya dipahami sebagai proses yang berlapis persepsi sering berubah setelah mahjong wins dilihat lebih dalam mahjong wins kadang dipahami dari cara berpikir bukan hasil ada alur tenang yang terbentuk saat mahjong wins dibiarkan mengalir mahjong wins muncul dalam bentuk pengalaman bukan kejutan dari sudut yang jarang diperhatikan mahjong wins terasa nyata ada banyak cara memaknai rtp tergantung sudut pandang pengamat dalam pengamatan jangka panjang rtp memiliki cerita sendiri di balik angka rtp terkadang tersimpan pola pemahaman melihat rtp sebagai bagian dari gambaran yang lebih besar rtp bukan sekadar rujukan namun bagian dari proses berpikir rtp kerap muncul dalam diskusi saat pengalaman mulai dibandingkan rtp menjadi menarik saat dibaca tanpa ekspektasi berlebihan rtp sering dipahami berbeda ketika konteksnya ikut diperhatikan rtp terasa berbeda ketika dilihat dalam alur yang utuh rtp tidak selalu berbicara angka kadang soal pola pikir

slot gacor hari ini

Petugas Administrasi Rumah Sakit Pekanbaru Temukan Celah Cuan Lewat Game Big Bass Bonanza

Yuantoto

LGO234

Slot Gacor

<a style="visibility: hid